Chinese Local Governments developing relations with Latin America

Mi opinión para el Blog de la Asociación de Estudios Regionales. Gobiernos Locales chinos desarrollando relaciones con América Latina.

According to the World Economic and Social Survey (2013), cities and towns have become the primary human living space. Since 2007, more than half of the world’s population has been living in urban areas and the figure is estimated to exceed 70 per cent by 2050 (DESA, 2013: 53). China has made a huge contribution to this. That is why Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz declared that two significant forces would shape global prosperity this century: U.S. technological innovation and urbanization in China (The Economist, 2014). Chinese cities matters, and its engagement in international affairs as well.

For a long time, the State has been considered the most important actor in international affairs. As a result, the implementation of the foreign policy has been a prerogative of the central government. However, globalization has brought the emergence of new actors in world politics. These new players are companies, non-governmental organizations, and subnational governments, among others.

China is not an exception. From the late 1970s when China adopted reform and its opening-up policy, “the twin forces of decentralization and internationalization not only further upgrade the salience of provinces within China but also turn them into some sort of international actors, particularly in foreign economic relations” (Chen, 2005: 1). The Chinese local governments – either cities or provinces – are developing relations with their counterparts all over the world.

Chinese cities and provinces have become increasingly involved in international engagements, signing cooperation agreements and joining international organizations, such as C40, 100 Resilient Cities, Metropolis, or traditional networks like United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG). For example, the Foreign Affairs Office of Guangzhou Municipality also manages its multilateral relations within the frame of the UCLG and Metropolis (Tavares, 2016). Through these offices, they have established special units to organize their international diplomacy. “Chinese cities seem, not just comparatively, structurally well equipped for city diplomacy. All Chinese cities have a “Foreign Affairs Office” to coordinate their sister-city programmes” (Acuto; Morissette; Chan; Leffel, 2016). These local governments are also developing relations with Latin America. They have held conferences, signed agreements – called Sister or Twinning Agreements, completed trade missions, issued official public statements, amongst other actions.

This is not an improvised attempt for developing these relations. On the contrary, the Chinese government has encouraged this kind of ties. The “China’s Policy Paper on Latin America and the Caribbean” issued by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs,  in 2008 and 2016, calls to support actively exchanges and cooperation from a local perspective.

On the other hand, the Forum of China and Community of Latin American and Caribbean States aims to promote a “new development of their relations at a higher level by enhancing China-LAC overall cooperation”(China – Celac Forum 2016: 4). That is to say, a space that looks for the “political coordination and nothing else, destined to give the frame for big consensuses within which each country or group of countries promote specific projects with credits offered by China” (Matta, 2016:77).

Within the China – Celac Forum (2016), there is a forum called “China-LAC Local Governments Cooperation Forum” and it aims at promoting friendly cooperation between local governments of China and LAC states in various fields. This is the main framework by which the Chinese government has promoted this kind of links. As result, the cities and provinces of China are developing relations with Latin America.

Although there is no specialized literature that summarizes the entire exchange between China and Latin America from a local perspective, there are examples that show specific cases that describe these relationships. In Argentina, the Government of the Province of Entre Ríos has signed Cooperation Agreements with Jilin and Henan Province (Ippolito, D; Cabrol, C. 2012). In Mexico, we have found the federal states are developing relations with China such as Jalisco, State of Mexico, Chihuahua, Hidalgo amongst others (Flores, 2011).  The Region of Biobío, located in the central-south of Chile, is the region of the country that has had the most progress and accomplishments through developing links with the Chinese provinces and cities. This region has held conferences, signed agreements, completed trade missions, and issued official public statements, amongst other actions. These are just examples of the development of links between China and Latin America.

In this post, we have paid attention to the links with Latina American cities. However, the relationship with international networks such as C40 or UCLG or other geographical zones such us Europe or Africa should be more studied as well as the, in general, the international engagement of cities and regions.

References

Department of Economic and Social Affairs. DESA. 2013. World Economic and Social Survey. Sustainable Development Challenges. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_current/wess2013/Chapter3.pdf

The Economist. 2014. Building the dream. Special report on China.  https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/20140419_china.pdf

Chen, Zhimin. 2005. ‘Coastal Provinces and China’s Foreign Policy’, in Hao, Y. and Su, L. (eds.) China’s Foreign Policy Making: Societal Force and Chinese American Policy. London: Ashgate. pp. 187-208.

http://www.cewp.fudan.edu.cn/attachments/article/68/Chen%20Zhimin,%20Coastal%20Provinces%20and%20China’s%20Foreign%20Policy%20Making.pdf

Tavares, Rodrigo. Paradiplomacy. Cities and states as a global players. 2016. Oxford University Press. New York, USA.

Acuto, Michele; Morissette, Mika; Chan, Dan; Leffel, Benjamin. 2016. ‘City Diplomacy’ and Twinning: Lessons from the UK, China and Globally. UK Government’s Foresight Future of Cities Project. City Leadership Initiative, Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London.

China – CELAC Forum. 2016. Basic information about China – Celac Forum. Department of Latin American and Caribbean Affairs. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China. http://www.chinacelacforum.org/eng/ltjj_1/P020161207421177845816.pdf

Matta, F. R. (2017). China, Innovación y tradición: Nuevas relaciones Estado-Mercado-Sociedad. Santiago de Chile: RiL Editores. Translation from the author.

China – CELAC Forum. 2016. Basic information about China – Celac Forum. Department of Latin American and Caribbean Affairs. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China. http://www.chinacelacforum.org/eng/ltjj_1/P020161207421177845816.pdf

Ippolito, Daniel; Cabrol, Cynthia. 2012. Relaciones Internacionales de Gobiernos Sub-Estatales: Un Estudio sobre la Cooperación Descentralizada de la Provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina 1994-2012. Cuarto Congreso Uruguayo de Ciencia Política, “La Ciencia Política desde el Sur”, Asociación Uruguaya de Ciencia Política.

Flores, Rafael. 2011. La diplomacia multinivel en la relación México-República Popular China: perfil de desempeño y desafíos ante el siglo XXI. PORTES, revista mexicana de estudios sobre la Cuenca del Pacífico. Volumen 5, Number 10. Colima, México.

Un comentario Agrega el tuyo

  1. Patricia Heredia dice:

    Excelente, aunque no entiendo mucho

Responder a Patricia Heredia Cancelar respuesta

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Conectando a %s